|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2012 21:33:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2012 22:11:27 GMT -5
Thanks a bunch! That def gives us some where to start with published works  Sent from my Desire HD using ProBoards |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2012 22:41:13 GMT -5
Cool! Although the title is somewhat misleading; the study states that there's no real difference between cooked and raw diets in terms of digestability, but they are both better than kibble.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sherry on Mar 6, 2012 22:47:10 GMT -5
Definitely a good start! But they really need to also look at the fact that a cooked diet alone, without heavy supplementation, will not meet the cat's dietary requirements. But good find, all the same. Thanks |
|
|
|
Post by Heather on Mar 6, 2012 22:51:41 GMT -5
That's excellent. Even having them state that something other than kibble is better and that raw actually falls in as a logical alternative is a bonus. I suppose that having them claim that more study is necessary and should be followed up with is good news. I would hate to think what Hills would do with a raw diet though  Look what they did with kibbles  ciao |
|
|
|
Post by Sherry on Mar 6, 2012 22:55:02 GMT -5
Or Proctor and Gamble?   |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2012 23:01:32 GMT -5
I LOATHE P&G!!  |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2012 3:25:18 GMT -5
also not much benefit from simply being fed raw beef - not many domestic cats I know of in the habit of taking down cows. nothing mentioned about the dangers of feeding 1 type of meat only without edible bone. THAT's where raw diets get short changed - it isn't as simple as slapping a slab of beef in front of the animal! But it IS a START! Although completely unnecessary for those of us already immersed in the natural program! Cheers, Kim P.S. here is another link with more into written & tad more plainly evolveanimalnutrition.blogspot.com/2012/03/raw-diet-research-finally.htmlHAH! Vindication begins!  |
|
